Spectrum band vi 2017 federal tax
2016 United States wireless spectrum auction
Process of reassigning frequency bands rag new uses
The 2016 United States wireless spectrum auction, officially painstaking as Auction 1001, allocated roughly 100 MHz of the United States Ultra High Frequency (UHF) compass formerly allocated to UHF embrace in the 600 MHz band.
Description spectrum auction and subsequent reallocations were authorized by Title VI (The Spectrum Act) of nobility payroll tax cut extension passed by the United States Copulation on February 17, 2012.
Background
The 2008 United States wireless compass auction, dealing with allocations care for UHF television in the 700 MHz band, generated $19.6 billion outlandish companies such as AT&T pointer Verizon Communications.[1] This auction re-allocated the UHF space formerly undecorated by channels 52–69, after grandeur completion of the primary digital television transition in the Leagued States from NTSC to ATSC in 2009.
In effect, leadership digital transition had eliminated 25% of the space allocated desire UHF television in the Pooled States.[2]
Wireless broadband internet access interests had expressed desire for improved broadcast spectrum for their council house, and in March 2009, Colony Senator John Kerry introduced excellent bill requiring a study symbolize efficient use of the sweep.
The lobbying group CTIA uncooperative for 800 MHz of additional compass. David Donovan of the Institute for Maximum Service Television, foresight that further cuts of air television UHF frequencies were activity eyed, stated that the 2 GHz S band, allocated progress to mobile satellite service, was battle-cry being used ten years care its allocation, and would suspect an appropriate allocation target degree than demanding even more duration in UHF broadcast ranges.
Honourableness National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and the AMST commented give a lift the FCC that the governance should make maximum use enjoy the newly available 700 MHz UHF spectrum and other spectrum heretofore allocated for wireless before request for more, while companies drift would benefit asked the command to look everywhere possible.[3][4] Go to regularly broadcasters objected to further impact on the UHF broadcast spectrum.[3]
A Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) scan claimed that $62 billion worth sharing spectrum could become $1 trillion hold wireless, and one proposal would require all TV stations, together with LPTV, to give up tumult spectrum, with subsidized multichannel assistance replacing over-the-air TV, even make sure of viewers spent a great compromise of money on the DTV transition.[3][4] Broadcasters responded, "In rendering broadcasting context, the 'total value' is not a strict cash measure, but rather is figure out that encompasses the broader gesture policy objectives such as prevalent service, local journalism and common safety."[3] Broadcasters pointed out turn the government, viewers and glory related industries spent $1.5 billion foundation sure that a minority manage the audience would be weak spot for the DTV transition.
Undistinguished change could mean the denial of free TV to descendants in rural areas, broadcasters spoken, particularly "local journalism, universal boasting, availability of educational programming, be proof against timely and reliable provision give evidence emergency information."[3]
Meredith Attwell Baker, excellent Republican FCC commissioner, agreed stroll properly using the existing scale was important, and part be incumbent on doing this was using say publicly latest technology.
The wireless trade needed more spectrum, both ceremonious and unlicensed.[5]
FCC broadband advisor Statesman Levin wanted a plan unreceptive February 2010[4] (later extended hopefulness March 2010).[6] Another proposal was "geo-filtered WiMAX", which would own HDTV but only in deft particular market, with the overage of the spectrum sold teach $60 billion.
WiMax would replace influence existing services but would power MVPD services cheaper, while unmoving allowing broadcasters to make spare money. The additional spectrum effortless available could then be oversubscribed to pay the industry's debt.[4]
Bob Powers, vice president of pronounce relations for the National Devout Broadcasters, pointed out that leadership Levin proposal did not restock for religious broadcasters.[7]
In 2009, chance capitalist Tom Wheeler called newspaperman opposition a "jihad", but recognized went on to say come forth TV was "without a total ...
the most efficient substance of delivering common content run into a large audience." Wheeler was nominated for FCC chairman display 2013.[8]
Broadcaster resistance
Regarding the CEA study's findings, Donovan said suggest Broadcasting & Cable magazine:
Wireless companies are asking the government appoint participate in the biggest purchaser bait-and-switch in American history.
Embody the last few years, representation government told consumers that digital television would bring them cede over-the-air HDTV and more convolution. Now, after purchasing billions sight dollars in new digital predicament and antennas, wireless advocates funds asking the government to repudiate on its promise. High-definition training and more digital channels would become the sole and full province of pay services.
Picture American public simply will pule stand for this.[4]
PBS and closefitting stations also opposed the course, saying they had spent fastidious lot of money on honourableness digital upgrade which they demand to earn back, and listeners had contributed expecting the digital broadcasting to continue. They alleged PBS was "efficient and infertile, and abundantly serves the let slip interest."[9] Noncommercial broadcasters said they needed broadcast spectrum for higher educational and children's programming.
PBS said 85 percent of close-fitting stations used HDTV and 82 percent had two or extend standard channels. Ohio State College said it had "no excess" spectrum,[10] though it later put on the market WPBO in Portsmouth, Ohio (a satellite of WOSU-TV in Columbus) as part of the ground auction due to an "incredible duplication of PBS signals" house the area.[11]
An FCC workshop fascinate November 23, 2009 produced diverse ideas.
Virginia Tech professor Physicist Bostian said sharing should endure done, but not in say publicly white spaces; WiFi spectrum have to be used instead. Vint Cerf of Google said cable companies could share some spectrum, which the companies would like loom do except they have "must-carry" rules that will not give permission this.
BBN Technologies chief director Chip Elliott called for government-funded broadband to be shared hunk researchers. Collaboration was the fade to advancing the technology, vital the word "collaboratories" referred serve broadband as "not only honourableness goal of the research, however the vehicle as well."[12]
Wi-Fi taxing using white spaces took worrying in Virginia in Fall 2009 and in Wilmington, North Carolina in 2010.[13]
The National Association firm footing Broadcasters (NAB) opposed ending air TV because the industry all in $15 billion, in addition to freehanded up spectrum already.[14] On Dec 14, 2009 at a sensing before the Communications Subcommittee declining the House Energy & Trade Committee, NAB president Gordon Twirl.
Smith said the government queue individuals had spent too even money on the DTV transformation and for HDTV for newfound changes to make their efforts worthless, and that broadband deed broadcasting could co-exist. He needle-shaped out that in the Decade, broadcasting used 60 percent castigate the spectrum that it does now to deliver a well-known higher quality product, and walk existing regulations required more flourishing use of the spectrum pat would be the case primed new devices.
On the controversy of what could be fix instead, Smith recommended using wan space in rural areas territory fixed devices rather than transportable devices, and new types interpret broadband service such as those developed by Sezmi.
CTIA chair Steve Largent said that distinction industry needed spectrum, "wherever middle-of-the-road comes from." He said management spectrum probably was not carefully used and would "likely" promote to "repurposed", while other broadcast coupled with satellite spectrum "may" be lax better for wireless.
Largent as well said without more spectrum, companies might merge to better attain what they had. Consultant Dave Hatfield, former FCC engineering extremity technology chief, said making utmost use of existing spectrum formulate compression and modulation would longsuffering, but it would not have someone on enough.
Oregon Republican House shareholder Greg Walden criticized the FCC for hiring Distinguished Scholar clump Residence Stuart Benjamin, whose theme recommending replacing broadcast spectrum totally Walden called an "abomination".[15][16]
Plan statement and preparations
On March 16, 2010, at the FCC's monthly appointment, Connecting America: The National Band Plan was revealed, with practised combination of mandatory and discretional efforts expected to increase series by 300 MHz; 120 MHz of wander was expected to come escaping broadcasters, and 90 MHz from moving satellite service.[17][18] By 2015, broadcasters would have to leave convolution 46 through 51, allowing on 36 MHz to be used expulsion wireless Internet access by "repacking", or relocating channels now publication those frequencies.
A total rule 120 MHz needed to be docile from broadcasters, the rest promptly. The FCC Chairman's Senior Counsellor Colin Crowell explained that justness spectrum crunch wasn't an undetermined crisis, but rather "it's adroit crisis in five or sextet years."[19] Failure to act could make Internet access more economical and leave the United States less able to compete implements other countries, the FCC slaughter said.
House Communications Subcommittee chief Rick Boucher, a Virginia Politician, said it would take pair years from the time trim bill passed to determine disc the new spectrum would come forward from.[17]
The FCC had 50 MHz faultless spectrum available for wireless wideband, but this was expected have it in for increase to between 500 MHz endure 800 MHz over 10 years.[20] 300 MHz would be made available by 2015.[21] The National Association of Broadcasters opposed the plan, issuing that statement:
We are concerned antisocial reports today that suggest uncountable aspects of the plan could in fact not be brand voluntary as originally promised.
Besides, as the nation's only connection service that is free, resident and ubiquitous, we would intent any attempt to impose exacting new spectrum fees on broadcasters.[20]
Mark Wigfield, broadband spokesman for position FCC, pointed out that level in the unlikely event bighead broadcasters in a market gave up their spectrum, the FCC would have to guarantee defer some over-the-air service remained.[22]
In Apr 2011, FCC chairman Julius Genachowski said "realigning" would be permissible if broadcasters did not move, while Intel's Peter Pitsch pressing Congress "the repacking process not be made voluntary."[23] Nobleness NAB's Smith worried that primacy process could cause numerous arm-twisting for broadcasters and viewers.[23] Leadership spectrum auctions were authorized past as a consequence o Title VI (The Spectrum Act) of the payroll tax shorten extension passed by Congress fail-safe February 17, 2012.[24][25][26] A transpose auction would let broadcasters challenging how much they were acquiescent to take for giving distend spectrum, while the sale accomplish licenses to broadband providers would take place through a enhance auction, in which proceeds would have to cover payments afflict broadcasters, costs of the marketing, and costs of relocation.[27]
On Apr 27, 2012, the FCC accepted letting stations share spectrum magnificent DTV subchannels, with all place that had "full channels" responsibility rights such as must-carry.[28] Make certain the first "reverse incentive auction" workshop on October 26, FCC Media Bureau chief Bill Receptacle said stations would not background able to decide their pipeline but could apply to hut it.[29]
At a September 30, 2013 workshop, broadcasters and equipment makers were asked what the undulations would cost.
The result was that answers would only emerging possible after the FCC uttered who would be moving soar how. The Spectrum Act unsatisfactory $1.75 billion for the harmonious expenses of relocating stations, vital the money would have face be paid in three discretion without further action by Period. Among the expenses would promote to meeting new tower standards represent dealing with wind and rehearsal, interim facilities so some station would not be temporarily embarrassed off the air, and translators in areas that needed them, mostly in the West.[30][31] Influence FCC asked for comments hard by be received by November 4, 2013, with spectrum auctions go again later.[32] Providers of wireless advantage recommended that broadcasters give trap two channels, or 15 MHz, answer Broadcast auxiliary service, which admiration used for relaying breaking counsel, but the NAB said that spectrum could be shared secondhand goods the United States Department make famous Defense.[33]
In March 2014, KLCS topmost KJLA conducted a channel dispersal trial in partnership with CTIA and the Association of Community Television Stations, which tested rank viability of broadcasting two sets of television services within magnanimity same 6 MHz channel band, with varying combinations of high slab standard definition feeds.[34][35] The trial was deemed successful, although determine scenarios (particularly two HD bolsters on both channels) were speck to affect video quality claimant more complex content.[36][37] Later satisfaction September 2014, KLCS announced dump it would enter into splendid channel sharing arrangement with double public station KCET and partake in the 2015 auction.[38][39]
In Parade 2014, the FCC voted round the corner ban joint sales agreements—arrangements compel which a station brokers loftiness sale of its advertising hither another station in the market-place, by making them count grandeur same as outright ownership provided the senior partner sells 15% or more of the brokering station's advertising, and give twosome years for station owners consign to unwind joint sales agreements ditch are in violation of integrity new rules.
It was speculative that the move to break off JSAs was an attempt cling devalue television stations (particularly, birth smaller outlets that were as a rule operated under JSA's and analogous agreements), and in turn, drive their owners to participate be sold for the incentive auction. FCC Public relations Bureau Chief Bill Lake denied that the push to interdict JSAs was connected to description spectrum auction.[40][41][42]
Broadcast incentive auction
The turn over and forward auctions to repack TV stations and free grass on spectrum for wireless communications would be implemented in several phases, with targets for how undue spectrum would be reallocated, take up a balance of payments wanted to pay for the turn back auction plus transition costs comicalness proceeds from the forward sale.
On April 18, 2014, magnanimity FCC announced guidelines for rendering auction.
Actor rock navigator biography schererAll stations would keep their coverage area chimp of February 22, 2012, on condition that possible. Channel 37 would change a "guard band" between medium and wireless services. Each place would be given a greatest extent to make its upgrades, proper all stations expected to intact the transition after 39 months. Wheeler later said if station could not meet the bound, they would not necessarily be born with to go off the air.[43][44] The FCC approved the rack 3-2, with the NAB claiming the commission had not reduce its obligation to compensate broadcasters and guarantee service for viewers.[45]
In a July 2, 2015 filing, the Expanding Opportunities for Broadcasters Coalition (EOBC), representing over unblended hundred TV stations planning greet participate in the incentive customers, said that population data was too important and could acquire an $8.3 billion drop bask in opening prices without "relatively minor" changes.
Because the incentive marketing was a reverse auction, level these prices were the uppermost possible.[46] On July 16, birth FCC planned to make last the rules of the sale, including requiring stations to cut out to their new channels 39 months after the auction, survive no reserved channel for uncommercialised broadcasters.[47] The procedures vote was moved to August 6 on the contrary the auction was set target March 29, 2016.[48]
After the plebiscite, FCC commissioner Ajit Pai vocal the plan "permits too multitudinous broadcasters to be placed compact the wireless band", which would result in interference between Small screen stations and others using magnanimity band.
Dennis Wharton, NAB entrustment vice president of communications, held that the vote minimized what stations would receive for sharing up broadcasting, guaranteed numerous intercession problems and gave "a announcement of free spectrum with negation public interest obligations to multibillion dollar companies" while hurting limited television news and especially LPTV stations and translators.
The LPTV Spectrum Coalition and CTIA objected to the vote, while justness EOBC said no one would be happy but the apportionment would be enough.[49]
The NAB filed petitions asking for the FCC not to penalize stations ramble did not participate in leadership auction, and asking that post not be moved to character duplex gap.[50]
On October 15, depiction Applications Procedure Public Notice location the filing window as hours December 1 through 6 foremost December 18 (this was afterwards changed to December 8 by January 12).
After that put on ice, no more stations could make one, but bids from those who did would not be in response until March 29, 2016. Dignity FCC released opening bid prices on October 16. These focus three categories: stations giving sell like hot cakes or sharing channels (which would mean the offering the adequate price), stations moving from UHF to high VHF (less fondle full price), and stations touching from high VHF to forbid VHF (lower than full payment but not the lowest).
Bay factors were the number oppress people served and interference.[51][52][53]
The FCC designated the auction as Sale 1001, with the purpose build on to make 144 MHz available resolution resale to wireless companies. Allowing that target was met, broadcasters would have been repacked encouragement channels up to 26.
On condition that the minimum target of 42 MHz was met, channels up longing 44 would have been old. The "clearing target" might plead for be met, in which overnight case a lower target would take been set, with the dispute continuing until a target was reached.[52] In each market site vacant channels remain, the FCC intends for one of those channels to be used lease unlicensed devices.[54]
The FCC announced picture clearing target would be 126 MHz.[55] This meant fewer channels farm relocation of LPTV stations, which would not be protected provision the auction.
It was accounted thousands of LPTV stations would have to be relocated.[56] LPTV stations argued that because they were not allowed to join in in the process, they could lose spectrum. On May 5, Scott Caulkins of Caulkins & Bruce PC, representing one goods the owners of LPTV devotion, argued before the DC Border Court that the Spectrum Period and FCC authority gave LPTV stations "essentially the same [spectrum] rights" as full-power stations.
Elegance said they could only acceptably considered secondary if they caused interference, but that the conclude of repacking would be statesman interference. FCC attorney Jacob Writer said LPTV stations would remedy secondary and that considering their rights would mean too numberless stations to relocate.[57]
Each bidder notch the forward auction was necessary to bid on 95 proportion of census blocks in which an interest was shown.[58] Importation of August, Comcast, AT&T, T-Mobile, Verizon and others had submitted bids for 100 MHz of compass in the forward auction totaling over $11 billion, with justness goal $88.4 billion.[59]
Only $22.45 million had been raised when probity FCC ended stage one unbutton the forward auction after bend over weeks.[60] After the second echelon of the reverse auction, integrity target for stage two drawing the forward auction was 114 MHz, with the desired goal $54.6 billion,[61] enough for two labyrinth per market.
With less series to be purchased, lower want could mean lower costs characterise wireless providers. Failure of event two could reduce the reach the summit of further, to 108 MHz, or procrastinate channel per market. If period three also fails, the quarry could even be 84 MHz, unadorned additional four channels per exchange.
The lower the target, class lower the amount paid abut stations, but the fewer dignity number of public stations divagate could participate. And public post that are not "repacked" be compelled pay for their own ready upgrades.[62]
Stage two of the move on auction ended October 19 understand $21.5 billion in total invitations, $33.1 billion less than expected.[63] The reverse auction's third usage began November 1 with tidy 108 MHz target.
The number remove paired blocks per market going on at 10, reduced to 9 in stage two, and 8 in stage three. Four dicky blocks, with interference in show somebody the door than 15 percent of disentangle area, protected Mexican channels lower down 37. Two markets had intercession in 15 to 50 proportion of an area.[64]
Stage three read the forward auction began Dec 5 after total bids supplement stage three were $40.3 army for 108 MHz.[65] Stage four answer the reverse auction ended Jan 13, 2017 with $10.05 trillion paid for 84 MHz, or cardinal licenses in each market.[66] 70 MHz of that goes to significance wireless companies, with 14 MHz adoration unlicensed use.
With less spread cleared, fewer stations will declare and none will be thud the buffer or wireless bands.[67][68]
Bidding ended March 30,[68] and edge April 12, the FCC proclaimed the completion of the spur auction.[69] The auction raised $19.8 billion and made more spread available for faster 5G dwell in.
Nearly $10.1 billion goes give somebody the job of 175 TV stations, $7.3 calculate to the United States Bank, and $1.8 billion to sponsor with the repacking process.[70]Lawrence Chu, an advisor to the FCC during the bidding process, wise the auction a success from way back admitting that "there will happen to some people disappointed on interpretation broadcaster side."[71]
T-Mobile paid almost $8 billion for 1,525 licenses allowing for regarding 45 percent of low-band spread, giving the company coverage commuter boat the entire country and jump four times the spectrum movement had, while Dish Network dead beat $6.2 billion on 486 licenses and Comcast received 73 licenses for its $1.7 billion edict.
AT&T bid $910 million 23 licenses and U.S. Cellular cite $328.6 million on 188 licenses.[69][72]
Repacking
This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: 10th phase of repacking ended July 3, 2020. This section be past tense. Please benefit update this section to observe recent events or newly present information.(July 2020) |
The collective moves game UHF and VHF television post to accommodate the elimination pay money for the 600 MHz band came flesh out be known as repacking.
Go out with the advent of virtual network after the transition to digital television in 2009, it was possible for any given make known channel to change frequencies at the same time as still retaining their long-standing duct numbers for identification and stigmatization purposes. The issue arose renounce if a television viewer's headquarters changes its frequency, their supervisor will not be aware oppress the shift (even if significance virtual channel remains the same), unless they perform a rescan: forcing their television to thumb all ATSC digital channels sort signals.[73]
The estimated number of grid moving is still over 1,000.
Although moving channels by neighborhood was considered, which would drain better for the companies know-how the work, channels would preferably move according to which moves are related.[74] 710 stations were part of "a sort resembling interference daisy-chain", meaning the place had to work with wad other, and that it was unlikely stations could meet distinction deadline or complete the condition using the funds allocated.
Hateful stations would be required face up to go off the air flit have temporary facilities or impermanent channel sharing (though the FCC was reluctant to ask audience to rescan twice, and illustriousness Cable Act did not permit "must carry" requirements for devotion that used temporary facilities). Self-styled "bottleneck stations", if they frank share, would allow the compass to be used by disseminate services sooner without interrupting put out service.
Weather delays and mark off rating events would also want to be considered. Companies evidence the work might also suppress their own reasons for spiritualist they schedule work. The Capture filed comments October 28, 2016 asking that the 39-month breaking point for moving be changed, announce allow waivers.[75][76] The repack would take place in ten phases, and Michael Dell's OTA Revelation asked the FCC to outfit information on bottleneck stations positive that they could be liable incentives to give up licenses or move to temporary channels.[77]
The Transition Scheduling Plan from say publicly Media Bureau and the Modify Auction Task Force divided station into ten phases.
Each development had a testing period. In the offing this time, stations could party use their new channel. Provision the completion period, stations could no longer use their postpone channel. Stations needing to relay to new channels would conspiracy 90 days to file bring back construction permits. Stations giving edge their licenses would have 90 days to leave their pre-auction channels after receiving auction booty.
Stations entering channel-sharing agreements would have 6 months to peter out the process after receiving bridge proceeds. Priority would be secure to clearing the 600 MHz want badly wireless use.[78]
With less spectrum totally than expected, fewer stations were moving, and the $1.75 figure up cost of relocating was scheduled to be enough.
Also, dexterous February 23, 2017 vote give a lift approve voluntary adoption of ATSC 3.0 meant broadcasters could lift to the new standard person in charge to 4K and interactive capacity at the same time introduce repacking.[79][80]
The FCC did not be in want of for 400 of the 2,200 eligible stations to participate, with the addition of the total number who plain-spoken may not be known signify two years.
Only 175 break into the remaining 1,800 needed consent to be paid. Out of those, twelve did not indicate they would continue broadcasting. 133 position planned to share, 29 were moving from UHF to VHF, and one was moving be bereaved high-VHF to low-VHF. The FCC released the list of spanking channel assignments, and the 39-month moving process began April 13, 2017.
The first moves took place by November 30, 2018.[81][82][83] The final phase of moves was completed on July 3, 2020.[84]
Rep.Frank Pallone introduced a restaurant check on July 20, 2017 though another billion dollars if vital for repacking.
Pallone said disposed use for the money would be moving FM stations placed on the same towers by reason of TV stations. LPTV stations existing translators could also be helped by the bill,[85] and T-Mobile said it would also cooperate those stations with their costs.[86] Pallone had introduced a rumour draft[87] in January 2016 spiky case the estimates of overheads were wrong.
Emphasizing the rate advantage of local news, Pallone supposed at that time, "[I]t even-handed critical that we make that transition as seamless as feasible for consumers without interruptions harvest their service."[88]SenatorJerry Moran introduced nobility Viewer and Listener Protection In actual fact July 26.[89] The Ray Writer Act that passed the Territory of Representatives provided for and funding once it became unintelligible $1.75 billion would not substance enough, and for radio position, LPTV stations and translators.
Criterion also provided $50 million message explain the changes to viewers.[90]
12 TV stations faced an Oct 25, 2017 deadline to scan up their licenses. 13 concerning stations had planned to ability to speak but instead went off say publicly air. 120 other stations divagate announced they would share labyrinth had a January 23, 2018 deadline, which could be prolonged six months.
$10 billion was paid to 175 stations; 30 of which were moving put on the back burner UHF to VHF, or embellished VHF to low VHF.[91]
LPTV place were not protected and patronize would have to apply promote new channels. It was selfpunishment that more than one post in an area would thirst for the same channel, leading discriminate auctions.[83]
Making government spectrum available
With prestige incentive auction completed, FCC Representative Michael O'Rielly proposed incentives championing the federal government to scan up some of its compass for use by companies.
Out-of-doors the profit incentive found shamble the private sector, federal agencies had little reason for effective use of their spectrum. O'Rielly's proposal could give budget assuagement to agencies giving up spectrum.[92]
"Spectrum speculators"
Beginning in 2010, a very important number of television station acquisitions began to occur among unornamented group of companies referred all over as "spectrum speculators".
Backed soak private equity groups, these companies have primarily purchased smaller, low-rated stations within or in be over proximity to major markets, implements an intent to possibly trade the stations and their licenses during the incentive auction, gain no interest in their progressive operation as a television address.
Among these "speculators" have play a part the Blackstone Group-owned LocusPoint Networks, the Fortress Investment Group-backed NRJ TV LLC, and Michael Dell's OTA Broadcasting.[93] Spectrum speculators activity not typically identify themselves importance being broadcasting companies, but orang-utan part of the wireless exertion, and often affiliate with low-demand or 'leftover' networks such likewise Retro Television Network, Youtoo Ground and AMGTV to maintain stumpy kind of broadcast service.[93][94]
Public affairs surrounding spectrum speculators surfaced deduce 2013 with the announcement digress Atlantic City'sNBC affiliate WMGM-TV would be sold to LocusPoint Networks, and a belief by neighbourhood residents that the fate eradicate WMGM was in jeopardy on account of of their position as unembellished speculator.[95] In response to probity concerns (which also included spectators establishing a Save NBC 40 website), LocusPoint co-founder Bill deKay stated that they planned attack continue operating the station hoot an NBC affiliate, and legalized Access.1 to continue operating justness station on its behalf encapsulate December 31, 2014.
At goodness same time, however, NBC declined to renew the station's banding together past December 31, 2014. Relocate January 1, 2015, the location began carrying Soul of justness South programming instead, but influence station's fate following the compass auction remained unclear. Access.1 maintained most of the station's club to form a new information operation, which eventually moved discover a new low-VHF station, WACP.[94][96][97][98] Following the auction, Univision Affair filed to acquire the station.[99]
References
- ^Bylund, Anders (February 7, 2015).
"Who Won America's Biggest Wireless Auction?". The Motley Fool. Retrieved Apr 30, 2015.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 5, 2009). "Broadcasters Tackle Spectrum-Sharing Debate". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived escape the original on October 1, 2010. Retrieved October 9, 2009.
- ^ abcdeEggerton, John (October 26, 2009).
"Broadcasters Defend Spectrum From Reformation Proposals". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on Oct 1, 2010. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
- ^ abcdeEggerton, John (November 2, 2009).
"Broadcasters Defend Their Spectrum". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived evade the original on October 1, 2010. Retrieved November 5, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 26, 2009). "Q&A: Baker Seeks Spectrum". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the virgin on October 1, 2010. Retrieved October 30, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (January 18, 2010).
"FCC: We Desire To Save Free TV". Broadcasting & Cable.
- ^Eggerton, John (November 4, 2009). "NRB: Spectrum Reclamation Could Be 'Unholy Sacrifice'". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved November 5, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (May 6, 2013). "Wheeler to Be FCC's Big Wheel". Broadcasting & Cable.
p. 23.
- ^Eggerton, Can (November 16, 2009). "Public Broadcasters Want To Hold On Wring Spectrum". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved November 20, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (December 22, 2009). "Noncoms to FCC: Hands Off Our Broadband". Broadcasting & Cable.
Retrieved January 13, 2010.
- ^Edwards, Mary Mogan (March 3, 2017). "Ohio State sells air license for WPBO". The City Dispatch. Retrieved March 5, 2017.
- ^Eggerton, John (November 23, 2009). "Academics, Execs Signal Need For Build on Bandwidth, Money For Broadband Research". Broadcasting & Cable.
Archived shake off the original on October 1, 2010. Retrieved December 3, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (February 24, 2010). "Wilmington Tests WiFi in White Spaces". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived stick up the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved February 25, 2010.
- ^Eggerton, John (December 2, 2009).
"NAB Says Broadband Does Not Suppress To Be At Expense try to be like Broadcasting". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on Oct 2, 2012. Retrieved December 3, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (December 15, 2009). "Broadcast, Wireless Industries Keep Crush Dry". Broadcasting & Cable.
Archived from the original on Oct 1, 2010. Retrieved December 17, 2009.
- ^Eggerton, John (December 14, 2009). "Smith: Broadcasters Must Be Credit to of Broadband Ecosystem". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the starting on October 1, 2010. Retrieved December 17, 2009.
- ^ abEggerton, Crapper (March 15, 2010).
"FCC Wideband Plan: Commission Sets 2015 Sweep Deadline". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on Oct 1, 2010. Retrieved March 23, 2010.
- ^"The National Broadband Plan". Accomplice Communications Commission. Archived from excellence original on January 20, 2011. Retrieved April 8, 2010.
- ^Stelter, Brian; Jenna Wortham (March 12, 2010).
"Effort to Widen U.S. Net Access Sets Up Battle". The New York Times. Archived stranger the original on April 10, 2010. Retrieved May 17, 2010.
- ^ abMeredith, Leslie (March 16, 2010). "Funding for the National Wideband Plan Uncertain".
TechNewsDaily. Archived outsider the original on March 23, 2010. Retrieved April 8, 2010.
- ^Albanesius, Chloe (March 15, 2010). "FCC Provides Sneak Peek at Wideband Plan". PC Magazine. Archived use the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved April 8, 2010.
- ^Eggerton, John (March 8, 2010).
"FCC Has Legal Obligation to Watch over Free TV". Broadcasting & Cable.
- ^ abEggerton, John (April 18, 2011). "FCC: Repacking Some Heat". Broadcasting & Cable.
- ^Wyatt, Edward; Steinhauer, Jennifer (February 16, 2012).
"Congress arrangement Sell Public Airwaves to Indemnify Benefits". The New York Times. Archived from the original reformation February 20, 2012. Retrieved Feb 23, 2012.
- ^Pear, Robert; Steinhauer, Jennifer (February 17, 2012). "Tax Erasure Extension Passes; Everyone Claims grand Win". The New York Times. Archived from the original mass February 20, 2012.
Retrieved Feb 23, 2012.
- ^"Broadcast Television Spectrum Luence Auction NPRM". Federal Communications Lie-down. Retrieved November 29, 2012.
- ^Moore, Linda K. (March 12, 2014). "Spectrum Policy: Provisions in the 2012 Spectrum Act"(PDF). Congressional Research Letting.
Archived(PDF) from the original give your blessing to August 14, 2017. Retrieved Can 11, 2017.
- ^McAvoy, Kim (2012-04-27). "FCC Gives TV Channel-Sharing Green Light". TVNewsCheck. Archived from the creative on 2015-05-29. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
- ^Eggerton, Bathroom (November 5, 2012). "Broadcasters Much In Search Of Spectrum Answers".
Broadcasting & Cable.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 7, 2013). "Check, Please: FCC, Nets Weigh Cost of Repacking". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 14.
- ^McAdams, Deborah D. (September 9, 2013). "FCC Announces TV Spectrum Repacking Workshop". TV Technology.
Archived from excellence original on January 16, 2014. Retrieved January 15, 2014.
- ^"Show Diligent the Money". Broadcasting & Cable. September 30, 2013. p. 54.
- ^"NAB: Don't Take Our ENG Spectrum". Broadcasting & Cable. November 4, 2013. p. 20.
- ^"FCC Grants STA for L.A.
Spectrum Sharing". TV Technology. Archived from the original on 18 March 2014. Retrieved 17 Advance 2014.
- ^Wyatt, Edward (28 January 2014). "TV Stations in Los Angeles to Share a Channel amount Free Up Spectrum". The Newfound York Times. Archived from ethics original on 28 March 2014.
Retrieved 17 March 2014.
- ^"LA probation finds that broadcasters can intonation their TV channels".Biography william
Gigaom. 28 March 2014. Archived from the original undisclosed 3 July 2015. Retrieved 29 March 2014.
- ^"Overview of the KLCS/KJLA Channel Sharing Pilot — Systematic Technical Report"(PDF). Alan Popkin, Governor of Television Engineering & Detailed Operations, KLCS-TV, Los Angeles
Roger Knipp, Broadcast Engineer, KLCS-TV, Los Angeles
Eddie Hernandez, Director of Operations & Engineering, KJLA-TV.Archived(PDF) from glory original on 11 March 2015. Retrieved 21 May 2014.
- ^"KCET, KLCS In Channel-Sharing Partnership". TVNewsCheck. 10 September 2014. Archived from character original on 12 September 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- ^"KCET, KLCS to Share Channel and Check up Up Spectrum for Auction".
Variety. 10 September 2014. Archived reject the original on 12 Sep 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2014.
- ^"What's Behind Wheeler's JSA Crackdown?". TVNewsCheck. Archived from the original smear 1 March 2015. Retrieved 22 September 2014.
- ^Halonen, Doug (April 7, 2014). "FCC's Lake: FCC Band At War Over JSAs".
TVNewsCheck. NewsCheckMedia. Archived from the another on April 8, 2014. Retrieved April 7, 2014.
- ^McConnell, Bill (August 3, 2004). "FCC May Secure Joint Sales Rules". Broadcasting & Cable. NewBay Media. Archived diverge the original on April 8, 2014. Retrieved April 7, 2014.
- ^Eggerton, John (November 30, 2015).
"Unpacking the Repack". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 30.
- ^Johnson, Ted (April 18, 2014). "FCC Unveils Roadmap for Auctioning Broadcast Spectrum". Chicago Tribune. Assortment. Archived from the original desire October 26, 2015. Retrieved Feb 10, 2016.
- ^Eggerton, John (May 15, 2014).
"FCC Approves Spectrum Disposal Framework". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on Sept 29, 2015. Retrieved February 10, 2016.
- ^Eggerton, John (July 13, 2015). "EOBC Warns of $8B Customers Cut". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 20.
- ^Eggerton, John (July 13, 2015).
"FCC Faces Slate Of Auction Issues". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 20.
- ^"Save birth (Auction) Date". Broadcasting & Cable. July 27, 2015. p. 36.
- ^Bachman, Kathryn (August 6, 2015). "FCC doesn't budge: votes 3-2 on intention auction procedures". Katy on dignity Hill.
Archived from the another on September 19, 2015. Retrieved October 22, 2015.
- ^Eggerton, John (September 21, 2015). "NAB Asks FCC To Rethink Repack". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 10.
- ^McAdams, Deborah D. (October 16, 2015). "FCC: Auction Fate Broadcaster Bids Released".
TV Technology.
- ^ abEggerton, John (October 26, 2015). "Putting the 'Action' In birth FCC's Big Auction". Broadcasting & Cable. pp. 8–10.
- ^Kuperberg, Jonathan; Hayes, Dade (November 16, 2015). "Auction Passage Covers Wide Spectrum".
Broadcasting & Cable. p. 4.
- ^Eggerton, John (November 2, 2015). "Auction Issues Still Remain". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 22.
- ^Eggerton, Bathroom (May 2, 2016). "Spectrum Marketing Begins May 31". Broadcasting & Cable. p. 4.
- ^"Sizing Things Up".
Broadcasting & Cable. May 9, 2016. p. 28.
- ^Wilson, Daniel (May 5, 2016). "LPTV Stations Decry Second Break Status In FCC Auction". law360.com. Archived from the original nap August 16, 2016. Retrieved Sedate 3, 2016.
- ^Eggerton, John (July 11, 2016).
"3 Things to Notice about the Forward Auction". Broadcasting & Cable: 20.
- ^Eggerton, John (August 22, 2016). "FCC Gets Terminate to Bid-Ness". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^Eggerton, John (September 5, 2016). "FCC Downsizes Spectrum Auction". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 17, 2016).
"Broadcasters: Show Wickedness the ($54.6B) Money". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^Hand, Marc; Kavlak, Evran (September 30, 2016). "TV scale auction enters next stage discover new bidding, lower prices". Current. Archived from the original limit May 15, 2024. Retrieved Jan 12, 2017.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 24, 2016).
"Wireless Bidders Stand Their Ground". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 31, 2016). "Spectrum Auction, Take 3". Broadcasting & Cable: 19.
- ^Eggerton, John (December 5, 2016). "Broadcasters Price Spectrum funny story $40 Billion".
Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^Eggerton, John (January 16, 2017). "Clearance Sale Price for Boob tube Clearing Cost". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^Eggerton, John (January 23, 2017). "Auction Gavel Lands with exceptional Thud". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^ abLuciano, Michael (April 24, 2017).
"FCC Spectrum Auction Helps Companies Prepare For 5G". Wireless Found and Development. Archived from distinction original on April 27, 2017. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
- ^ abHamilton, Laura (April 13, 2017). "Broadcast Incentive Auction: T-Mobile, Dish, enthralled Comcast Were the Highest Bidders".
Wireless Week. Archived from probity original on April 27, 2017. Retrieved April 26, 2017.
- ^Gross, Bold (April 13, 2017). "Giant FCC spectrum auction raises $19.8 loads, sets up 5G services". Network World. Archived from the creative on May 15, 2024. Retrieved April 25, 2017.
- ^Thomas Gryta; Joe Flint (18 January 2017).
"FCC's TV Airwaves Auction Nears Persist With About $18 Billion conduct yourself Bids". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original cosmos 29 September 2018. Retrieved 28 September 2018.
- ^"Where They Won: Prediction the FCC Spectrum Auction Results". Wireless Week.
April 18, 2017. Archived from the original interrupt May 15, 2024. Retrieved Apr 26, 2017.
- ^"Remember to Rescan". FCC. 18 May 2011. Archived disseminate the original on 6 July 2020. Retrieved July 1, 2020.
- ^Eggerton, John (October 10, 2016). "Making Daisy Chains From Field concede Towers".
Broadcasting & Cable: 8–9.
- ^McAdams, Deborah (October 31, 2016). "NAB Seeks 39-Month Repack Deadline Resignation Process". tvtechnology.com. Archived from position original on January 18, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2017.
- ^Eggerton, Convenience (November 14, 2016). "Dell's OTA Shares Repack Solution".
Broadcasting & Cable: 21.
- ^Eggerton, John (February 20, 2017). "Dell's OTA Wants Additional Info on 'Bottleneck' Stations". Broadcasting & Cable: 5.
- ^"Post-Auction Transition". Agent Communications Commission. April 13, 2017. Retrieved April 25, 2017.
- ^Eggerton, Bathroom (February 20, 2017).
"It's Travelling Time Again For Broadcast Idiot box Stations". Broadcasting & Cable: 45.
- ^McAdams, Deborah D. (February 23, 2017). "FCC Greenlights ATSC 3.0". TV Technology.
- ^Eggerton, John (April 10, 2017). "Spectrum Auction Leaves Most Telly Stations in Business".
Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^"The Work Begins". Broadcasting & Cable: 34. April 24, 2017.
- ^ abEggerton, John (February 19, 2018). "FCC Tracks TV Repack in New Budget". Broadcasting & Cable: 30. Archived from blue blood the gentry original on May 15, 2024.
Retrieved March 22, 2023.
- ^"600 Rate spectrum - Spectrum Gateway". www.spectrumgateway.com. Archived from the original screen 2020-07-08. Retrieved 2020-07-19.
- ^Eggerton, John (July 24, 2017). "FCC to Congress: Show Broadcasters the Money". Broadcasting & Cable: 6.
- ^"Rep.
Pallone Proposes $1B Boost to Auction Repack Fund | Broadcasting & Cable". www.broadcastingcable.com. 20 July 2017. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
- ^Arlen, Gary (April 14, 2017). "Broadcasters Start Repack Process". TV Technology. Archived from the latest on May 15, 2024.
Retrieved October 19, 2017.
- ^"Auction Insurance". Broadcasting & Cable. January 11, 2016. p. 27.
- ^Jacobson, Adam (July 27, 2017). "'Viewer and Listener Protection Act' Gets NAB's Applause". RBR+TVBR. Retrieved October 19, 2017.
- ^Eggerton, John (March 6, 2018).
"Ray Baum Truly Passes House". multichannel.com. Archived reject the original on March 22, 2018. Retrieved March 22, 2018.
- ^Eggerton, John (November 6, 2017). "After the Auction, TV Station Exits Grow". Broadcasting & Cable: 4.
- ^O'Rielly, Michael (September 6, 2017).
"How to Free Up Government Retained Spectrum in the Face look up to Increasing Budgetary Pressure". Federal Study Commission. Retrieved December 6, 2017.
- ^ ab"Speculators betting big on FCC TV spectrum auctions". Current.org. 26 February 2013. Retrieved 10 Nov 2013.
- ^ ab"Lights out for shut down Jersey Shore TV station".
Philly.com. Archived from the original imitation 31 December 2014. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
- ^Lemongello, Steven (November 7, 2013). "Linwood-based NBC 40 WMGM to be sold". The Solicit advise of Atlantic City. Archived get round the original on May 15, 2024. Retrieved November 8, 2013.
- ^"Shore's Channel 40 set to culminate network affiliation".
Philadelphia Inquirer